#NoHymenNoDiamond

From Kings Wiki, masculinity and nationalism
Jump to: navigation, search
Nohymen.jpg

#NoHymenNoDiamond or #PoppedCherryDontMarry, also known as the one cock rule, is a movement that argues there is no such thing as a reformed whore; there is no way for a woman to erase her sexual past; and a woman's virginity should be preserved for her future husband. It is based on studies that have shown that the more sexual partners a woman has had, the less likely she is to describe her marriage as happy.[1][2] GBFM notes:

And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

JEsus was trying to tell us the same thing that Heatristez is trying to tell us.

Mary a young virginalz womensz and the story of life will make you one fleshz, as only your semenz makes it into her wombsz and the entire church and culture and westenr civicliatzion and FATHERHOOD sprang forth from thos Mosaic Judeo Christian premise of ONE man ONE WIFE. Yes, JEsus beat da GBFM to da ONE COCK RULE By 2,000+ years. But hey, HE WAS JESUS!

And thenm when the central bankers set out to conquer the west, they created fmeinsims to undermine civilizatinz’ central tenet, to exract money from men for the pussy that marriage makes holy and takes out of the money-changersz handz, and the DALROCKS And VOX’S ROSE to destory the family and teach that jesus came to abolish the law of moses, and teach men that only by game, and not by christian moses law, would they beocme “happily married fathers.”

And so the VOXs nd DALROCKS lead the very own destruction of their fellow men, as they dined on the cattle of the sun god, and repalced JESUS and MOSES with Dalrockian, Voxian game lzozzlzll.

Critiques[edit]

Accusations of hypocrisy and of assumptions of a woman's rejection by her previous sexual partners[edit]

One of the mottos of this movement is, "If she wasn't good enough for the one she gave it up to, why would she be good enough for you?" Another is, "They say one man's trash is another man’s treasure... But you won't see us sifting through the garbage for a wife!"[3] Supposedly, a rebuttal to this is that women can break up with men, too,[4] although this does not address the concern that the woman may have a history of sexual promiscuity and relationship instability indicating deeper personality flaws. Another of the complaints about this movement is that its "members unfairly judge the actions of sexually active women", supposedly.[5] Someone on Tumblr wrote, "Oh man, who even are these people? Either virgins or hypocrites."

Controversy about the actual hymen[edit]

According to the new "No Hymen No Diamond" Facebook page:

The myth of hymens being broken from physical activity is still being perpetuated today. The hymen is surprisingly rigid until it is broken during intercourse. The whole "horseback riding" propaganda started literally hundreds of years ago to protect the fragile reputations of promiscuous upper class young women who engaged in sexual activity prior to marriage. Back then, a non-virginal women was literally unmarriageable if she belonged to high society, or was part of the monarchy. This myth has continued to this day. Let's do what we can to stop spreading this potentially life ruining piece of information.

The Daily Dot quotes Therese Schechter as follows:[6]

"Guys who want women wrapped in their original packaging are approaching intimate relationships as if they were shopping for their collectible action figures," Shechter told the Daily Dot. "The good news is that anyone spouting judgments based on women's sexual choices are doing us a all favor. It's like they're wearing little bells around their necks telling us to stay very, very far away."

Shechter has a point. Anyone who believes that a woman without a hymen is "spoiled goods" is, simply put, badly misinformed. A hymen can be broken in a number of ways, long before a woman’s first experience with intercourse. And sometimes, the hymen may not have existed at all.

Differing interpretations of the data[edit]

Quoran Stephanie Vardavas writes:

I note, first, that the data set is 20 years old.

Second, I think it comes down to one's definition of a marriage that "succeeds."

A woman who has never had sex with anyone until she was married, and then only with her husband, has a very limited sphere of comparison for intimate relationships. Whether she believes that she is happy or not, she may have no idea that it is possible to have a better, more satisfying relationship. I'm not just speaking of sex here, but of emotional support and even joy.

When a woman has a little experience before marriage, she has a better understanding of the context in which her marriage exists. She has a basis for comparison in deciding whether she is happy, or even content, and a better understanding of what happiness and contentment mean to her.

Also, a bride without prior sexual experience is likely to be younger than an experienced bride, and less established in a career, perhaps less confident in her ability to take care of herself economically than an older, more experienced bride (who may have lived on her own before marriage).

Many virgin brides go directly from their fathers' houses into their husbands' houses and have little experience of any kind of independence. The unknown can be scary. So if a virgin bride is discontented or even desperately unhappy in her marriage, she is less likely to seek divorce because she is less confident of her ability to survive on her own. She may fear bringing shame or disgrace to her parents, perhaps tarnishing the prospects of any younger sisters. If she has children (and virgin brides by definition are less sophisticated in the use of birth control), she is even less likely to be confident in her ability to take care of herself and her children on her own.

So... a woman who is a virgin at marriage may be less likely to seek divorce.

I would question whether that truly means that her marriage is more "successful." At least from her point of view.

Gallery[edit]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Naso, Blair (11 December 2014). "Women Should Save Their Virginity For Marriage". Return of Kings. 
  2. Sharpe, Donovan (30 December 2014). "An Open Letter Of Apology To American Women". Return of Kings. What you didn’t realize while you were getting plowed through your teens and twenties is that more men you share your body with, the less able you are to sexually bond to your husband or any other male for that matter. This leads to dissatisfaction with the life you didn’t deserve in the first place and inevitably leads to divorce. 
  3. Pittman, Taylor (25 September 2015). "MRA Group Searches For ‘Beautiful Virgin’ Brides With Intact Hymens". HuffPost Women. 
  4. Waraich, Sukhmani (26 September 2015). "'No Hymen, No Diamond', Another Gem from a Men's Rights Group". Vagabomb. 
  5. Gallucio, Sophia (16 February 2016). ""No Hymen No Diamond": Misogyny Online". FEM. 
  6. Kabas, Marisa (24 September 2015). "With 'no hymen, no diamond' mantra, men's rights activists hunt for the perfect virgin". The Daily Dot. 

External link[edit]